HISTSEX ARCHIVES: NOVEMBER 1999

© Lesley Hall and list contributors




Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 10:38:45 +0100

From: Erik Ruendal <erik@ruendal.tue.bawue.de>

Subject: Re: E. Thoeny (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Th=F6ny?=) and Drawings of German officer

corps

My paperback encyclopedia (Meyers) gives the following entry (my

translation):

Thöny, Eduard, b. Brixen 9 Feb 1866, d. Holzhausen (=Utting a. Ammersee)

26 July 1950, Austrian caricaturist. - Since 1897 permanent staff with

the "Simplicissimus" in Munich; now and then socio-critical.

Maybe the "Brockhaus" has more information, but I don´t have it handy.

Hope this helps, best, Erik.



Mal123nash@aol.com wrote:

>

> I'm translating Hirschfeld's Homosexuality of Men and Women. He makes a

> reference to E. Thöny: "...or drawing general conclusions about the qualities

> of our officer corps from E. Thöny's drawings." I'd like to make an

> asterisked note if I could explain who Thöny is.

> Michael Lombardi-Nash



___________________________________________________________________

From: Mal123nash@aol.com

Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 14:19:29 EST

Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:=20E.=20Thoeny=20(Th=F6ny)=20and=20Drawings=20?=

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?of=20German=20officer=20corps?=

In a message dated 11/1/99 6:47:46 AM Eastern Standard Time,

erik@ruendal.tue.bawue.de writes:

<< aybe the "Brockhaus" has more information, but I don´t have it handy.

Hope this helps, best, Erik. >>

Dear Erik, thank you for your help and your reply. You gave me all the

information I needed. You will now be immortalized in the acknowledgements in

our translation of Hirschfeld's book:)

The book will be expensive, but I just wanted to send this link for your

information.

With best wishes,

Michael

___________________________________________________________________

Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 22:16:54 +0000

From: Ianthe <ianthe@duende.demon.co.uk>

Subject: 1980s oral history symposium, London

************************************************************

SECTION 28 AND THE REVIVAL OF GAY, LESBIAN

AND QUEER POLITICS IN THE 1980s

5-00pm-7-00pm, Wednesday 24th November, 1999

Senate House,

University of London, Malet Street, WC1

A 'witness seminar' organised jointly by the Institute of

Contemporary British History and the New Politics

Research Group. The aim of a witness seminar is to

allow those involved in an important historical event to

record their experiences and discuss the issues arising

from the event with each other and the audience, many of

whom will have been involved themselves. Entry is free.

All Welcome.

Panel Includes:

Angela Mason (Stonewall)

Peter Tatchell (Outrage)

Lisa Power (Stonewall/Outrage)

Rebecca Fleming (London Stop The Section)

Sue George (Bisexual politics activist)

Sue O'Sullivan (Activist and commentator)

For more information or to register in advance to be sure

of your place contact Virginia Preston:

vpreston@ICBH.ac.uk

The seminar is sponsored by Dept. of Politics, Sheffield

University; Dept. of Sociology, Open University; Dept. of

Sociology and Anthropology, University of East London.

************************************************************



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 02:22:53 +0100

From: Gert Hekma <hekma@pscw.uva.nl>

Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_E._Thoeny_(Th=F6ny)_and_Drawings__of_?=

German officer corps

Dear Michael,

you should certainly get B.Hergemoeller, Mann fuer Mann. Biographisches

Lexikon" (gay) Hamburg, Maennerschwarmskript, 1998, which has very many gay

bio's from the German speaking countries, but not (to my surprise) the one

you were asking for. There will soon be a review of this book by Hubert

Kennedy in the Journal of Homosexuality, I understood.

Sincerely yours,

Gert Hekma

At 02:19 PM 11/1/99 EST, you wrote:

>Histsex:For historians of sexuality - http://homepages.primex.co.uk/~lesleyah

>

>In a message dated 11/1/99 6:47:46 AM Eastern Standard Time,

>erik@ruendal.tue.bawue.de writes:

>

><< aybe the "Brockhaus" has more information, but I don´t have it handy.

> Hope this helps, best, Erik. >>

>Dear Erik, thank you for your help and your reply. You gave me all the

>information I needed. You will now be immortalized in the acknowledgements

in

>our translation of Hirschfeld's book:)

>The book will be expensive, but I just wanted to send this link for your

>information.

>With best wishes,

>Michael

>

> <A

>HREF="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1573927058/o/qid=941483532/sr=

2-1

>/102-7197427-2652025"> </A>M<A

>HREF="http://www.prometheusbooks.com/site/catalog/gay6.html">agnus

Hirschfeld<

>/A>

___________________________________________________________________

From: "Lesley Hall" <lesleyah@primex.co.uk>

Subject: Re: George Cecil Ives

Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 19:57:36 -0000

Angus:

Ives had published by the mid-1930s a couple of works which were (in his

characteristic oblique fashion) apologias for homosexuality and pleas for a

reform in the law and attitudes - one was The Continued Extension of the

Penal Law and the other was on Extraorganic Habits of Animals (I think

that's the title). But I wouldn't be able to guess at what kind of

circulation these had. I would not have considered him a household name -

less so than e.g. Edward Carpenter - though I haven't specifically ever

looked (for example) for letters to the more progressive periodicals on the

subject of persecutions of homosexuals and the dreadful state of the law

which might have brought his name before the public - or a certain section

of it - in the same way as Stella Browne was by shooting off letters about

abortion law reform. He may have had a certain word of mouth reputation -

someone who was as up as Ives on who was 'one of us' was presumably himself

plugged into networks of gossip and information. For a reclusive type Ives

had a wide social circle.

Don't know that this is very helpful!

Lesley Hall

lesleyah@primex.co.uk

website http://homepages.primex.co.uk/~lesleyah

-----Original Message-----

From: A. G. McLaren <amclaren@UVic.CA>

To: Histsex:For historians of sexuality <histsex@listbot.com>

Date: 02 November 1999 19:18

Subject: Re: George Cecil Ives



>Histsex:For historians of sexuality -

http://homepages.primex.co.uk/~lesleyah

>

>I recently came across the records of a young man involved in a 1937 gang

>that blackmailed homosexuals in England. On occasion the youth called

>himself "George Ives", presumably a mocking tribute to George Cecil Ives,

>the sex reformer. Would anyone know how widely known Ives' writings and

>activities were?

>

>Angus McLaren

___________________________________________________________________

From: "Rictor Norton" <norton@rictor.freeserve.co.uk>

Subject: Re: George Cecil Ives

Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 22:08:58 -0000

The fullest account of Ives is in Jeffrey Weeks's _Coming Out_. Ives's

writings and activities were virtually unknown, and still are today (e.g. I

don't think we know his date of death). He was the least scandalous member

of his family, and his homosexual secret society was very secret. There is

no way anyone would call themselves George Ives in "mocking tribute" to

Ives -- unless he personally knew Ives (who like all gay Victorian men was

fond of working class lads). Otherwise it must be mere coincidence, which is

not so romantic.

--

Rictor Norton

mailto:norton@rictor.freeserve.co.uk

http://www.infopt.demon.co.uk/rcnorton.htm



___________________________________________________________________

From: "K" <hvalp@rhk.dk>

Subject: New on the list and seeking information

Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 00:36:40 +0100

Hello all!

Currently working on a post graduate research paper on women in medical =

discourse in Denmark in the period 1870-1910, I have come across two =

names which seems in some way to be relevant to my study, namely a Dr. =

Mandsley (England) and a Dr. Clarke (Boston, US.)

Apparently both were active in my area of interest and delivered =

scientific "proof" that women were biologically incapable of acquiring =

intellectual skills matching those of men. The authority of the two were =

called upon by a member of the faculty board of medicine(a professor) in =

1874 arguing that female students should never be admitted to the =

University of Copenhagen.

The woman in question later became the first female physician in this =

country.

So far I have not been able to find litterature or furtheby any of the =

two doctors, so if anyone on the list should have information concerning =

their works or other litterature relating to the period and subject, it =

would be of great help!

Lars Kolind

Bachelor of history (so far)

___________________________________________________________________

From: "Hall ,Dr Lesley" <l.hall@wellcome.ac.uk>

Subject: Re: George Cecil Ives

Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 11:39:16 -0000

Ives died in 1950 and there is an entry in 'Who Was Who' which describes him

as 'author and criminologist'. His publications listed include 'The

Graeco-Roman View of Youth'. The fact of his making it into WWW suggests

that he was not quite as obscure as all that, though it may have been his

work with bodies like the Howard League for Penal Reform which gained him

admittance.

Material from his scrapbooks was published during the 70s (I think) under a

title something like Scrapbooks of an Edwardian Eccentric.

Lesley Hall

lesleyah@primex.co.uk



___________________________________________________________________

From: Reumann@aol.com

Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 07:36:43 EST

Subject: Re: MDs in Denmark



Regarding Lars Kolind's questions:

Edward Clarke was a well-known Boston physician who campaigned against higher

education for women. His "Sex in Education; or, a Fair Chance for the Girls"

(1870s) was widely read and debated - Dr. Mary Putnam Jacobi, among other

feminists, wrote some responses to it. He appears often in histories of

gender in the late 19th century - for example, see Mary Roth Walsh's history

of women's medical education - title is something like "Physicians Wanted, No

Women Need Apply."

As for the other doctor, "Dr. Mandsley " could be a mispelling of Henry

Maudsley - try searching for information on that name.

- Miriam Reumann

Postdoctoral Research Fellow

Dept. of Biology & Medicine, Brown University

Providence, RI 02912



___________________________________________________________________

From: "Hall ,Dr Lesley" <l.hall@wellcome.ac.uk>

Subject: Henry Maudsley and female education

Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 13:30:54 -0000

Maudsley is a much-cited late Victorian psychiatrist - possibly because his

views fit so closely with preconceptions about the gender-oppressive and

sexually-repressive agenda of late Victorian medics - I'm not convinced he's

typical or representative. He is discussed in context as a psychiatrist by

Scull, Mackenzie et al, Masters of Bedlam. On his contributions to the

debate on female higher education, and indeed for an overview of the debate

at large, see Katharine Rowold, Gender and Science: late nineteenth century

debates on the female mind and body

Lesley Hall

lesleyah@primex.co.uk



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 08:14:44 -0500 (EST)

From: Brian Herrera <brian.herrera@yale.edu>

Subject: Re: New on the list and seeking information

lars-

You might search for Edward H. Clarke, _Sex in Education; Or, a Fair

Chance for the Girls_ (Boston: James R. Osgood, 1873). Louise Michele

Newman offers a compelling treatment of Clarke in her _White Women's

Rights_ (Oxford 1998).

best/brian

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Brian Eugenio Herrera PhD Program in American Studies, Yale University

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



___________________________________________________________________

From: "LJ Hall, Historical Studies" <Lisa.J.Hall@bristol.ac.uk>

Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:06:26 +0000

I was just doing some 'unrelated to my usual work' research around

Saartje Baartman, known in Europe as "The Hottentot Venus" - the

Khoi-Khoi women who was "displayed" arond England and France

(although the circumstances are rather debated)in the early nineteenth

century. Although she's well documented as a cultural/idealogical

symbol the details given of her life are very vague and shifting. I

just came across a very brief reference to her marriage in England and

subsequent bearing of two children and wondered if anyone knew the

source of this information or had any more details about it? If they

did I'd be very pleased to hear.

Thank you very much.

----------------------

LJ Hall, Historical Studies

Lisa.J.Hall@bristol.ac.uk



___________________________________________________________________

From: Mmantissa@aol.com

Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 14:05:15 EST

Subject: Re: Henry Maudsley and female education

In a message dated 11/3/99 7:35:31 AM Central Standard Time,

l.hall@wellcome.ac.uk writes:

> the gender-oppressive and

> sexually-repressive agenda of late Victorian medics

I am new to the list, and I realize that this is a silly question, but I

really do not understand the difference between "sexual" and "gender." I

know I am supposed to know. If it is too embarrassing, perhaps someone could

answer off list.

Melissa

Mmantissa@aol.com



___________________________________________________________________

From: "Lesley Hall" <lesleyah@primex.co.uk>

Subject: Re: Henry Maudsley and female education

Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 21:26:36 -0000

Melissa wrote

>> the gender-oppressive and

>> sexually-repressive agenda of late Victorian medics

>

>I am new to the list, and I realize that this is a silly question, but I

>really do not understand the difference between "sexual" and "gender." I

>know I am supposed to know.

In this context I was using the terms in fairly standard generally

understood ways to refer to Maudsley's medical arguments on the one hand

against the education and political rights of women and on the other to

advance a ferocious anti-masturbation line.

Lesley Hall

lesleyah@primex.co.uk

website http://homepages.primex.co.uk/~lesleyah



___________________________________________________________________

From: ddh@arts.gla.ac.uk

Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 17:48:12 +0000

Subject: Funding sources - Russian Archives?

I am writing to solicit suggestions for finding funding for a project which gathers

material on queer sexualities in the Russian Federation.

The project, named "GenderDok", is based in Moscow and operates from the

home of a Moscow academic, Viktor Oboin, who receives assistance from

students and from a gay American living in Russia. Since 1994, GenderDok

has been collecting and cataloguing Russian print media output on LGBT

themes: news items, cultural commentary, homophobic journalism, etc. In

addition it has collected an impressive range of Russia's emerging queer press,

especially harder-to-find literary, historical and cultural publications. Since

1995, GenderDok has published "Zerkalo" (The Mirror), a periodic bulletin-

digest which summarizes new acquisitions and Russian media coverage on

LGBT issues. The significance of this work is hard to exaggerate; queer

organizations have come and gone in the rocky transitions of Russian

grassroots politics, but little institutional memory of them remains. GenderDok

is providing present and future researchers with extremely valuable material.

GenderDok's current premises are gradually filling to bursting, and I am working

on a scheme to have some of its files transferred to Homodok in Amsterdam to

relieve the pressure. In addition, I am trying to locate sources of fairly modest

funds (ca. $7,000US) to give the group's activities some stability for the

medium term: to fund purchases of publications and stationery, and to enable

an email address.

Do list members have any suggestions, perhaps of granting agencies they have

approached or know of? Please e-mail me at: ddh@arts.gla.ac.uk

Thanks!

Dan Healey

Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine

School of History and Archaeology

University of Glasgow

5 University Gardens

Glasgow G12 8QQ

Tel. (0141) 330-5553

Fax (0141) 330-3511

ddh@arts.gla.ac.uk



___________________________________________________________________

From: "Lesley Hall" <lesleyah@primex.co.uk>

Subject: Re: A change is as good as a holiday...

Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 19:53:14 -0000

>about the change in name of the British Society for the Study of Sex

>Psychology to the British Sexology Society.

There's a para or two about the change of name in my article 'Disinterested

enthusiasm for sexual misconduct: the BSSSP 1913-1947' Jnl of Contemporary

History 1996 vol 30, of which I recently discovered I still have a few

reprints. I'll check the refs in my notes and see if I have any further

details

Lesley Hall

lesleyah@primex.co.uk

website http://homepages.primex.co.uk/~lesleyah



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 08:01:32 +1000

From: Ivan Crozier <i.crozier@scifac.usyd.edu.au>

Subject: Re: A change is as good as a holiday...

Thanks for the response: I am wondering if anyone has any thoughts on the

use of the word sexology in America? And what about when it started to

catch on in Britain: it must have been current before the BSSSP became the

BSS? And the Continent (if, indeed, it did). These are idle musings: most

of my research is packed away, as i am going over seas shortly.

Previously I wrote:

>I am hoping that some of you will be able to help me. I am after details

>about the change in name of the British Society for the Study of Sex

>Psychology to the British Sexology Society. Names, dates, politics,

>responses, sources: the usual things which I have not been able to access

>in Texas. Any sources, published or unpublished, will be gratefully

>received.

Cheers, Ivan

Ivan Crozier,

HPS Unit,

Sydney University,

Sydney, 2006,

Australia

email: i.crozier@scifac.usyd.edu.au



___________________________________________________________________

Subject: Q: Sexology and Photography

Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 10:06:27 -0600

From: "Michael J. Murphy" <mjmurphy@artsci.wustl.edu>

Has anyone on the list ever read secondary literature on the use of

photography in sexological studies, especially sexology around the turn

of the (soon to be last) century? Especially interested in the use of

imagery to root theories of sexual inversion in physical anatomy or

physiology.

Best,

Michael J. Murphy, M.A.

Graduate Student, Dept. of Art History and Archaeology

Washington University, St. Louis

mjmurphy@artsci.wustl.edu

"In episode #228, who or what is 'Foucauldian'? We have enclosed a

self-addressed stamped envelope for your convenience."

-Letter to Alison Bechdel, cartoonist of Dykes To Watch Out For



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 22:56:49 +0100

From: Gert Hekma <hekma@pscw.uva.nl>

Subject: Re: Q: Sexology and Photography

Micheal,

the best source is Magnus Hirschfeld, Geschlechtskunde, Vol. 4 (1929 or

1930) which is a collection of images and pictures concerning sexology,

about 600 pages, including many on sexual inversion and hermaphroditism. I

saw it for sale on bookfinder.com but it will be pricy for obvious reasons.

James Gardiner has in his That is a pretty boy (or a title like that) some

sexological pictures, the one I like best is the anus from a pederast from

Ambroise Tardieu, Etude medico-legale sur les attentats aux moeurs (1857)

Gert Hekma

___________________________________________________________________ Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 14:11:47 -0700 (MST)

From: Tim Hodgdon <Tim.Hodgdon@asu.edu>

Subject: QUERY: Cat-calls and Street Harassment (fwd: cross post from H-WOMEN)

---------- Forwarded message ----------

Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 11:36:49 -0600

From: "Cordery, Stacy A." <STACY@monm.edu>

Reply-To: H-NET List for Women's History <H-WOMEN@H-NET.MSU.EDU>

To: H-WOMEN@H-NET.MSU.EDU

Subject: QUERY: Cat-calls and Street Harassment

Hi everyone,

This should be a fun one. I'm working on an exhibit for The Women's Museum

on sexual harassment on the streets. We want to include a list of the

one-liner cat-calls we women are subjected to every time we dare to go out

in public. We also want to juxtapose this against the kinds of things women

experienced a century ago.

I'm looking for two things here: the most unforgettable, outrageous,

annoying, insulting, etc. -- one-liners you've experienced over the years.

Also, any suggestions where I might find similar historical materials

relating to women's experiences on the streets and in public space during

the 19th or early 20th centuries.

Thanks in advance. For more info on The Women's Museum, check out our web

site at www.thewomensmuseum.org. The museum opens next fall in Dallas, and

is affiliated with the Smithsonian.

Debra Michals

Content Director, The Women's Museum

ABD Ph.D. candidate in American History, NYU

Debra Michals

ABD Ph.D candidate

American History

New York University

dam3385@is.nyu.edu



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 09:58:52 +1000

From: Ivan Crozier <i.crozier@scifac.usyd.edu.au>

Subject: Re: Q: Sexology and Photography

Dear Michael Murphy,

There are some photographs of hermaphrodites in one of the essays (I think

Steakley on Hirschfeld, but do not have a copy handy) in Rosario (ed),

Science and homosexualites, Routledge, 1997. They will suit your purpose.

In Ellis' "Eonism" he mentions an American guy called Flint who photgraphed

a cross-dresser in 1890, but I have never followed that refrence up. In

some of the criminal anthropology texts there are pictorial representations

of different 'classes' which might also be useful.

There are heaps of photographs of Norman Haire in the Sydney Uni Archives,

but that's probably not what you had in mind. I am not sure what he had in

mind, either!

I hope this helps.

Cheers, Ivan

Ivan Crozier,

HPS Unit,

Sydney University,

Sydney, 2006,

Australia

email: i.crozier@scifac.usyd.edu.au



___________________________________________________________________

From: Mal123nash@aol.com

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 05:28:51 EST

Subject: Re: Q: Sexology and Photography

Dear Michael,

The most recent publication I saw with photographs was "100 Years of the

Gay Rights Movement in Germany" ed. by Rainer Herrn (NY: Goethe-Institut,

1997) (1014 Fifth Avenue, NY 10028).

With best wishes,

Michael Lombardi-Nash

<A HREF="http://www.angelfire.com/fl3/celebration2000/">CELEBRATION 2000:

Karl Heinrich Ulrichs: 175 Years of Pride</A>



___________________________________________________________________

by lb2.listbot.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 1999 12:46:39 -0000

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 12:46:37 GMT

From: dcsouden@nildram.co.uk (David Souden)

Subject: Q re photography

One of the 'great' Victorians was Arthur Munby, who had a long relationship

with and secret marriage to the maidservant Hannah Culwick. Biographies of

him are extant (Murray), as is her diary/autobiography (Virago) and a

series of publications based on his photographs of working women. Some,

esp. Culwick, posed for him in men's clothing. The original photographs and

his diaries etc are in the Library of Trinity College Cambridge.

David Souden



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 14:39:23 +0100 (MET)

From: Katrin Rothe <Kat10@gmx.de>

Subject: Friedrich Salomo Krauss

Hello all!

I´m working on a paper on Friedrich Salomo Krauss. Especially, I´m

interested in the biography of Krauss and in the relationship between Krauss and

Sigmund Freud.

So far I have found literature avaible in Germany like the Anthropophyteia

and the Records of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Union. Still I´m after more

sources. I am hoping that someone will be able to help me.

Thanks in advance,

Katrin



Katrin Rothe

Humboldt- Universität

Unter den Linden 6

10099 Berlin

Germany

___________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 12:49:37 GMT

From: dcsouden@nildram.co.uk (David Souden)

Subject: More on Q re photography

There is also a growing late 19C emphasis on photography for clinical texts

e.g. on venereal disease. I will need to check refs and send directly.

David Souden



___________________________________________________________________

Subject: Re: Q: Sexology and Photography

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 09:32:35 -0600

From: "Michael J. Murphy" <mjmurphy@artsci.wustl.edu>

Thanks to all for your wonderful suggestions about sexological (or would

it be sex-illogical?) photography!Just now beginning to broach the topic

from a visual studies point of view. Interesting how photogaphy, widely

derided as only able to record surfaces not depth of character, is used

in a practice attempting to ground behavioral deviance in physical

difference.

Does anyone think there was space for resistance on the part of the

subjects of any of these photos? or were they thoroughly subjected by the

dominant gaze of the lens of the investigator?

Best,

BEst,



Michael J. Murphy, M.A.

Graduate Student, Dept. of Art History and Archaeology

Washington University, St. Louis

mjmurphy@artsci.wustl.edu

"I've always depended on the kindness of strangers." -Blanche Dubois



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:26:08 -0600

From: "M.E. Buszek" <buszekme@chickmail.com>

Subject: Re: Q: Sexology and Photography

On Wed, 10 Nov 1999 09:32:35 Michael J. Murphy wrote:

>

>Thanks to all for your wonderful suggestions about sexological (or would

>it be sex-illogical?) photography!Just now beginning to broach the topic

>from a visual studies point of view. Interesting how photogaphy, widely

>derided as only able to record surfaces not depth of character, is used

>in a practice attempting to ground behavioral deviance in physical

>difference.

One more article to add to the pile. About 5 years ago, the English feminist art historian Griselda Pollock wrote a piece about Munby's photography, psychoanalysis, and various relationships to his working-class female subjects. The piece, "'With my own eyes': Fetishism, the Labouring Body and the Colour of its Sex," was first published in _Art History_ Vol. 17, No. 3 (September 1994): 342-382.

Maria-Elena Buszek

Ph.D. Candidate

Kress Foundation Department

of Art History

The University of Kansas

___________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 13:08:41 -0700

Subject: Re: QUERY: Cat-calls and Street Harassment (fwd: cross post from

H-WOMEN)

From: "David Robinson" <dmrobins@U.Arizona.EDU>

I don't know if this fits with your project or not:

About a decade, two lesbian friends of mine were walking hand-in-hand down

the street in New York City. A man standing across the street from them

shouted out "Fags!" as they passed by.



David Robinson

----------

>From: Tim Hodgdon <Tim.Hodgdon@asu.edu>

>To: "Histsex:For historians of sexuality" <histsex@listbot.com>

>Subject: QUERY: Cat-calls and Street Harassment (fwd: cross post from H-WOMEN)

>Date: Tue, Nov 9, 1999, 2:11 PM

>

> Histsex:For historians of sexuality - http://homepages.primex.co.uk/~lesleyah

>

.__________________________________________________________________

Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:04:50 +0000

From: cristina santos <cristina@fe.uc.pt>

Subject: contraceptive pill

Hi

Does anyone know the year when the contraceptive pill was invented? And

does that same year agree with the time when it became the most used

contraceptive? And who invented it?

Bearing in mind that it had so many effects on how we address sexuality

now-a-days, it's strange that for such simple questions it gets so

difficult to find an complete answer!...

Thanks,

Cris



___________________________________________________________________ Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 09:46:05 -0700 (MST)

From: Tim Hodgdon <Tim.Hodgdon@asu.edu>

Subject: Re: contraceptive pill

According to John D'Emilio and Estelle B. Freedman, the oral

contraceptive pill was approved for public use in 1960

(*Intimate Matters,* 250). They refer readers to James

Reed, *From Private Vice to Public Virtue: The Birth Control

Movement and American Society Since 1830* (New York: Basic

Books, 1978), 311-366.

Tim Hodgdon

Ph.D. candidate

Faculty Associate

Department of History

Arizona State University

Tim.Hodgdon@asu.edu

___________________________________________________________________

From: Reumann@aol.com

Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 11:54:52 EST

Subject: Re: contraceptive pill

Try either Linda Gordodn's _Women's Body, Women's Right_ or Elizabeth S.

Watkins, _On the Pill_ (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U. Press, 1999) - both give

timelines on the development, marketing, etc. , of the contraceptive pill.

- Miriam Reumann

Postdoctoral Research Fellow

Div. of Biology and Medicine

Brown University



___________________________________________________________________

Hi there,

David Halberstam's video series "The 1950s" (the volume called something

like "A Consuming Desire") has a great segment on the development and

legalization of the Pill in the United States.

Heather

___________________________________________________________________

Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:10:00 -0500 (EST)

From: "julie l. thomas" <julthoma@indiana.edu>

Subject: Re: contraceptive pill

A great place to read about the invention of the pill is Linda Grant's

text _Sexing the Millenium_. There's a chapter on the pill called the

"off-shore population laboratory" or something along those lines. The

chapter focuses on the eugenic / racist experimentation of the pill on

Puerto Rican women. It includes some interesting commentary/quotes by

those involved in the creation of the pill.

Julie Thomas

Indiana University

;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)



JULIE L. THOMAS

Visting Lecturer

Gender Studies

Indiana University

Bloomington IN 47405

* Course Web Site: http://www.indiana.edu/~gens

* Personal Home Page: http://php.indiana.edu/~julthoma/

Ph.D. Candidate, Russian History and Gender Studies

(-; (-; (-; (-; (-; (-; (-; (-; (-;



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 12:26:14 +1100

From: Hera Cook <hera.cook@history.usyd.edu.au>

Subject: Re: no simple answers - contraceptive pill

> Does anyone know the year when the contraceptive pill was invented? And

> does that same year agree with the time when it became the most used

> contraceptive? And who invented it?

> Bearing in mind that it had so many effects on how we address sexuality

> now-a-days, it's strange that for such simple questions it gets so

> difficult to find an complete answer!...

If by complete you mean simple, it is hard to find such an answer because the

issues are very complicated and there are no simple answers.

The most important person in the invention of the pill is possibly Magaret Sanger

who conceived of the idea during the interwar period and persuaded Katherine

McCormick, an ex-suffragette who had married the heir to the Harvester Tractor

fortune to donate money for the early research. Pharmaceutical companies and

academic institutions would not get involved because contraception was an

unacceptable topic. From this point on there are very many men and few women

involved in the development (except in the UK where the Family Planning

Association ran additional trials all through the 1960s)

For this part of the history I think Bernard Asbell's _The Pill_ Random House,

1995 is an enjoyable accessible read. Lara Marks has been writing an academic

history of the scientific and medical development of the pill which is being

published by Yale University Press very soon - maybe even this year. There is a

self-aggrandising account by Carl Djerassi who contributed a small part of the

chemical development and wants to be known as the 'father of the pill' -

interestingly he made stacks of money out of his work unlike Sanger and

McCormick.

To respond to a couple of other suggestions - For the trials - E.Seigal-Watkins

and Linda Grant represent opposite ends of the spectrum on the issue of race and

the pill - the former is, in my opinion naive - while the latter is presenting an

argument first put forwards in the 1970s. This does not acknowledge the fact that

the pill was also tested on white women and that many of those involved in the

Puerto Rican trials were genuinely caring about women in poverty. However on

balance I think Grant (or Linda Gordon's marvellous book ) explain more of the

world in the 1950s and 1960s than Seigal-Watkins does, but you will have to read

both and decide.

Tim Hodgdon's date from D'Emilio and Freedman is the best that exists - the FDA

approval of the drug as a contraceptive in 1960 is probably the most important

date in its history. In this instance their stamp of approval was accecpted

throughout the Western world.

My doctorate was initially about the pill and the sexual revolution - did one

take place and what if anything did the pill contribute to it? Seigal-Watkins

argues that the pill did not contribute to the sexual revolution - she is talking

about the USA - I argue that it did - I am talking about Britain. I think she may

be wrong about the USA but I don't know the evidence well enough. Certainly the

history of the pill was different in different cultures. You won't find any easy

answers to this one.

Hera



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 22:10:06 +0100

From: Gert Hekma <hekma@pscw.uva.nl>

Subject: Re: reviewing a book on Havelock Ellis

Dear friends,

a colleague asked me if I knew someone who might be able and like to review

the below-mentioned book. I suppose some of you may have an interest in

doing so. You can get a copy by way of the author whose addres follows below.

Greetings,

Gert Hekma



Chris Nottingham, The Pursuit of Serenity. Havelock Ellis and the New

Politics (Amsterdam University Press,1999).ISBN 90 5356 386 5



By the last decade of his life Havelock Ellis had become an icon of

progressivism in both Europe and the United States, He was revered not only

as the author had done most to unravel the mysteries of human sexuality but

as a pioneer of feminism. His reputation, however, has been in free fall

since his death in 1939. Though still recognised as a pioneer in the study

of human sexuality, he now attracts adverse criticism from those he would

have considered his natural heirs. Feminist authors have been particularly

hostile, identifying him, in his works and his life, as the kind of friend

women would have done well to ignore. While there is no need to set Ellis

back on his pedestal it is clear that recent interpretations have failed to

take account of the times in which he wrote and have underestimated the

breadth of his contribution to progressive thought on both sides of the

Atlantic.

Chris Nottingham examines these neglected areas considering Ellis as public

health enthusiast, penal reformer, eugenicist, campaigner for

internationalism, and promoter of the works of Ibsen and Nietzsche, as well

as reinterpreting the better-known works on gender and human sexuality. He

argues that behind the apparent variety of Ellis's interests was a unifying

vision which first came to him as an eighteen year old but was reinforced

in the generational movement which swept through London in the 1880s. It

within this movement, the 'anti-Victorian revolt', that Ellis was able to

find friends and an audience and to take the first steps in a career which

was to lead to international fame and notoriety. It was here that the

multiplicity of progressive enthusiasm became forged into the 'new

politics'.

Later historians have largely ignored Ellis preferring to concentrate on

the radicals who promised a direct political road to the better future. In

recent years he has been grudgingly afforded credit as a pioneer of the

scientific study of sexuality, identified as the predatory male in feminist

clothing, vilified for his unconventional sexual tastes, but more commonly

ignored. However, the collapse of socialist political hopes in our own

times and the reformation of progressive opinion around ethical themes

suggest that this neglect should not continue. This investigation

therefore, in offering a reappraisal of the work of Havelock Ellis, also

indicates ways in which the progressive tradition itself might be usefully

re-examined.

Chris Nottingham teaches politics at Glasgow Caledonian University and is a

visiting research fellow in the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences

in the University of Amsterdam.

****************************************************************************

Chris Nottingham EMail: C.Nottingham@Gcal.ac.uk

Dept of Social Sciences Phone: +44 141-331-3169

Glasgow CALEDONIAN University Fax: +44 141+331+3439

Glasgow



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 09:10:32 +0100

From: Erik Ruendal <erik@ruendal.tue.bawue.de>

Subject: Re: contraceptive pill

There was an exhibition on the history of the Pill not too long ago at the

Dresden Hygiene-Museum, and there also is a catalogue available. As far as I

know it is in German only. They also have an internet-page but I cannot find the

address right now. If you would like to have more info don´t hesitate to contact

me directly. HTH, Erik.

___________________________________________________________________

Date: 12 Nov 1999 15:32:03 -0000

From: "Histsex:For historians of sexuality" <histsex-owner@listbot.com>

Subject: Administrative message

As my access to computers/Internet over the next couple of weeks is likely

to be haphazard, I am changing over the list to unmoderated status for the

duration at least. I am sure that the usual standards of civility will be

maintained, but would remind listmembers to make sure they do not send to

the list messages intended for an individual.

Lesley Hall

histsex-owner@listbot.com

lesleyah@primex.co.uk



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 09:28:10 -0800

From: Heather Lee Miller <miller.1438@osu.edu>

Subject: Re: Q: Sexology and Photography

Hi there--sorry this is a late response to this query.

Definitely also take a look at Jennifer Terry's new book, _American

Obsession_ (UChicago Press), which deals with sexologists, homosexuality,

and the body, as well as her article (and others) in _Deviant Bodies_ (ed.

Terry and Jacqueline Urla).

>>Has anyone on the list ever read secondary literature on the use of

>>photography in sexological studies, especially sexology around the turn

>>of the (soon to be last) century? Especially interested in the use of

>>imagery to root theories of sexual inversion in physical anatomy or

>>physiology.



___________________________________________________________________

From: "Rictor Norton" <norton@rictor.freeserve.co.uk>

Subject: History of Gay Bathhouses

Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 10:02:53 -0000

Some subscribers may be interested in the website (which is fairly new I

think; it's still growing) on the History of Gay Bathhouses by Eddie

Coronado Jr.:

http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/Cafe/8767/

Though it's popular rather than academic, it's a fascinating contribution to

the "social geography" approach to sexual subcultures. It's very well

illustrated, with photos of the baths, some of their customers, artwork used

to decorate them, contemporary advertisements, pages from diaries, etc.

--

Rictor Norton

mailto:norton@rictor.freeserve.co.uk

http://www.infopt.demon.co.uk/gayhist.htm



___________________________________________________________________

From: Mal123nash@aol.com

Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 04:58:40 EST

Subject: Re: History of Gay Bathhouses

In a message dated 11/13/99 10:12:06 AM Eastern Standard Time,

norton@rictor.freeserve.co.uk writes:

<< http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/Cafe/8767 >>

Dear Rictor,

What a great discovery. As you may know, I'm translating Magnus

Hirschfeld's "The Homosexuality of Men and Women." Because I saw many

references to bathhouses, I began to index them. For example, I thought it

was interesting to discover that around of the turn of the century, it cost

one dollar to get into a bathhouse in New York. I also learned something

about baths' attendants. Anyway, I came to respect the idea of baths and the

people who run them.

Mike



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:08:30 +0000

From: "Diane Mason" <d.mason@bathspa.ac.uk>

Subject: Pro-Onanism doctors?

Dear all,

Does anyone know whether the American doctor Alice Bunker Stockham ever

pronounced favourably about the 'benefits' of masturbation for both

sexes? According to an essay I read on the net recently, this is indeed

the case but this really doesn't bear out the views of Stockham put

forward in her volume Tokology: A Book for Every Woman, published in

England and the USA around the turn of the century. If anyone knows

anything about her, I would appreciate some clarification on this

matter.

Indeed, did any nineteenth-century doctors endorse the 'solitary vice'

in any way? I know James Paget was a lot less scathing than many but

were there any more? From a nineteenth-century homosexual perspective

too, was masturbation viewed in a more favourable light than sodomy as a

sexual practise by the medical profession? All comments on these

questions will be invaluable to my research and very gratefully

recieved.

Thank you all and best wishes,

Diane Mason



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 22:15:19 +0100

From: Gert Hekma <hekma@pscw.uva.nl>

Subject: Re: Pro-Onanism doctors?

Dear Diane,

according to the book of J.Stengers and A.Van Neck, Histoire d'un grand

peur: La masturbation, Brussels 1984, there are several physicians who did

not follow the majority's re/abjection of masturbation. The book of

T.Tarczylo, Sexe et liberte au siecle des Lumieres, Paris 1983, discusses

specifically Tissot and what came after him.

In the Dutch context I found a small case history of a physician who got a

young man as a patient who asked the doctor to remove his balls because he

was addicted to onanism, knew the relevant literature and wanted to get rid

of his unwellcome desires. The doctor said to him that these books were not

so reliable, and were meant to make profit for the publishers who knew the

desire of youngsters to read about sex, that the consequences of

masturbation were not so bad as he thought, and he should keep the organs

that made him a man. The boy left the doctor but was soon back, having cut

one of his balls himself!

Having read most of the medical journals of the time, I have to say there

were very few messages about masturbation in the 19th C. for the

Netherlands, and indeed very few suggestions for therapy or mechanical

devices against it.

One journal (1882) also quoted Lasegue (who invented the word

exhibitionist) who said that masturbation was a result of a mental disease,

and the problem was not masturbation, but the mental disease. He advised

not to struggle against self-stimulation (which Lasegue considered to be

harmless), but to deal with the cause. In 1899 another journal quoted

Loewenfeld who even should have stated that masturbation enhanced the

health of the person, and that Tissot was completely mistaken about the

dire results of the practice.

Regarding masturbation and homosexuality, I would suggest that the change

from a perspective on masturbation from a fear for the physical

consequences of these practices to a view that stressed that masturbation

was an asocial sex act and homosexuality not, resulted in a certain upscale

valuation of homosexual acts compared to onanism. The older theories

stressed that the vice of self stimulation would lead to more vicious

lusts, f.e. rape, sodomy and bestiality (f.e. in Kaan 1844), so same-sex

acts were graded lower and considered to be much worse than onanism, but

since 1900 with an ideology of relationships and democratic sex,

homosexuality fared much better than it did before, and some doctors may

have considered it less damming than masturbation, while others might still

have the old hierarchy in their minds that homosexuality was worse than

self-stimulation that was only a stage that kids passed through.

The case is in: W. Mees, Een geval van auto-castratie, Nederlandsch

Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 23:30 (1879), pp. 449-451.

Hope this helped you,

Gert Hekma

___________________________________________________________________

Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 08:47:41 -0800 (PST)

From: "A. G. McLaren" <amclaren@UVic.CA>

Subject: Re: Pro-Onanism doctors?

Stockham believed that intercourse was a spiritual exercise so actually

opposed masturbation. In Karezza (1896) she stated that men were to be

taught that it was unmanly to lose their 'seed' as it was to cry. Marital

intercourse was to take place once every 2 to 4 weeks, perhaps only once

every 3 to 4 months. In Tokology she lamented the fact that "we teach the

girl repression, the boy expression." What she wanted was greater

restrictions for both, a single sexual standard.

As regards doctors' views I don't think you will find any in the 19th

century that would say onanism was a good thing, but some accepted that it

was not as dangerous as Tissot claimed.

Angus McLaren

___________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 15:20:59 -0500

From: Sheila McManus <smcmanus@YorkU.CA>

Subject: Re: QUERY: Cat-calls and Street Harassment

By far the weirdest thing I've ever had yelled at me was "hey, you from San

Francisco?", as my girlfriend and I walked by a group of young men in

Toronto one summer evening holding hands. Now, maybe in the twilight they

mistook us for two gay men (unlikely but then I don't credit harassers with

much intelligence) or they just associate all us homos with the fair city

of San Francisco.

Sheila McManus



* * * * * * * * * *

Sheila McManus

Ph.D. Candidate, Department of History, York University

smcmanus@yorku.ca



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:47:41 -0700

Subject: Re: QUERY: Cat-calls and Street Harassment

From: "David Robinson" <dmrobins@U.Arizona.EDU>

I know that the following isn't an example of street harassment, but I

thought I'd share it anyway:

When the Lesbian Avengers were first organized in New York City, they handed

out a lot of palm cards with their address, phone number, etc. Almost

immediately, some man left a message on their answering machine, calling

them cocksuckers.

David Robinson

___________________________________________________________________

Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 12:06:54 +0000

From: cristina santos <cristina@fe.uc.pt>

Subject: Anthropology and homosexuality

Hi. I'm not sure if i already sent you this one. If so, I apologize; if

not, enjoy it!

I was doing a little research on the Internet and I found an interesting

paper at the American Anthropological Association site, which some of the

list members might find useful. So, there it is:

http://www.aaanet.org/colgiarpt.htm

Greetings to all,

Cris



___________________________________________________________________

From: "Chris Willis" <chris@chriswillis.freeserve.co.uk>

Subject: Re: cyber-fem: pill taking

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:03:51 -0000

Hi!

Yes - this is a real problem. The warning on some brands simply says that

the Pill "may react badly with some antibiotics" or words to that effect.

In fact, many antibiotics simply stop the Pill from working, and you could

end up pregnant. Doctors tend to assume women already know this, but most

of us don't!

All the best

Chris

=========================================

Chris Willis

English Dept

Birkbeck College

Malet Street

London WC1E 7HX

Chris@chriswillis.freeserve.co.uk

http://www.chriswillis.freeserve.co.uk/

=========================================

-----Original Message-----

From: Zoetanya Sujon <zsujon@hotmail.com>

To: alridley@hotmail.com <alridley@hotmail.com>

Cc: skemp@chat.carleton.ca <skemp@chat.carleton.ca>

Date: 21 November 1999 17:38

Subject: Fwd: cyber-fem: pill taking



>Histsex:For historians of sexuality -

http://homepages.primex.co.uk/~lesleyah

>

>Hi,

>

>Sorry again for the mass mailing - I just thought that this information on

>the pill might be of interest to you - or people you know. I certainly

have

>never heard about the pill's susceptibility to other drugs before. This

>segment is from a discussion list on reproductive technology (e-mail:

>cyber-fem@hsphsun2.harvard.edu). I apologize in case of cross-postings.

>

>

>Cheers,

>Zoe

>

>

>>>From: "KATHRYN OTHS" <KOTHS@tenhoor.as.ua.edu>

>>>

>>>Another major but less than well-known reason for women getting

>>>pregnant while using the pill is that antibiotics render the pill

>>>ineffective. Physicians often forget to alert women to this problem

>>>with unfortunate consequences. (Many of the 500 women in a recent

>>>NIH study I conducted on job strain and low birth weight cited

>>>antibiotic use as the reason they got pregnant while "on" the pill.

>>>I'm sure many more of those with unplanned pregnancies had them for

>>>this reason without realizing it.)

>>>

>>>Kathryn Oths

>>>Associate Professor

>>>Department of Anthropology

>>>University of Alabama

>>>

>>Good point, Katha. Here are some drugs that interact with the Pill.

>>

>>Acetaminophen: the Pill makes it less effective for pain relief.

>>Alcohol: the Pill potentiates its effects.

>>Anticoagulants: less effective

>>Antidepressants: potentiation

>>Barbiturates: decrease Pill effectiveness

>>Penicillin: ditto

>>Tetracycline: ditto

>>Vitamin C: increases estrogen concentration (most pills have estrogen

>>and

>>progestin)

>>Source: Hatcher et al (l988:222-223)

>>

>>Elena Hannah

>>Psychology Department

>>Memorial University

>>

___________________________________________________________________

Subject: Hephaistion question

Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 03:06:37 -0800

From: "andrei-f" <andrei-f@goplay.com>

I would be grateful for historical references to the relationship

between Alexander and his friend.

Thank you

Andrei

___________________________________________________________________

Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 14:11:03 -0800

From: Karen Duder <kduder@UVic.CA>

Subject: Bisexual Women & Identity

*Apologies for double postings*

Does anyone out there know of any new (1995-9) works on bisexual women,

besides Paula Rust's _Bisexuality and the Challenge to Lesbian Politics_,

Beth Firestein's _Bisexuality: The Psychology and Politics of an Invisible

Minority_, and Kristin Esterberg's _Lesbian and Bisexual Identities_? I'm

looking particularly for material that examines the construction of

subjectivity. I've also looked at _Bisexuality: A Critical Reader_ and

_RePresenting Bisexualities_. Suggestions? Others might be interested in

titles too, so you could reply to the list rather than to me personally.

Many thanks,

Karen

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Karen Duder PhD Programme

Department of History Email kduder@uvic.ca

University of Victoria Dept. Phone (250) 721-7382

P.O. Box 3045 Dept. Fax (250) 721-8772

Victoria, B.C. V8W 3P4

CANADA

"Any measurement must take into account the position of the observer.

There is no such thing as measurement absolute, there is only

measurement relative. Relative to what is an important part of the

question." Jeanette Winterson, _Gut Symmetries_

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



___________________________________________________________________

Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 12:27:25 +0000 (GMT)

From: Lucy Bland <l.bland@unl.ac.uk>

Subject: Re: Bisexual Women & Identity

Another book that you could look at is "The Bisexual Imaginary"

edited by Bi Academic Intervention (P. Davidson et al) Cassell,

1997.

On Sun, 28 Nov 1999 14:11:03 -0800 Karen Duder <kduder@UVic.CA> wrote:

Lucy Bland

---------



___________________________________________________________________

From: "Zoetanya Sujon" <zsujon@hotmail.com>

Subject: Fwd: cyber-fem: pill taking

Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 17:04:00 GMT

Hi,

Sorry again for the mass mailing - I just thought that this information on

the pill might be of interest to you - or people you know. I certainly have

never heard about the pill's susceptibility to other drugs before. This

segment is from a discussion list on reproductive technology (e-mail:

cyber-fem@hsphsun2.harvard.edu). I apologize in case of cross-postings.



Cheers,

Zoe



>>From: "KATHRYN OTHS" <KOTHS@tenhoor.as.ua.edu>

>>

>>Another major but less than well-known reason for women getting

>>pregnant while using the pill is that antibiotics render the pill

>>ineffective. Physicians often forget to alert women to this problem

>>with unfortunate consequences. (Many of the 500 women in a recent

>>NIH study I conducted on job strain and low birth weight cited

>>antibiotic use as the reason they got pregnant while "on" the pill.

>>I'm sure many more of those with unplanned pregnancies had them for

>>this reason without realizing it.)

>>

>>Kathryn Oths

>>Associate Professor

>>Department of Anthropology

>>University of Alabama

>>

>Good point, Katha. Here are some drugs that interact with the Pill.

>

>Acetaminophen: the Pill makes it less effective for pain relief.

>Alcohol: the Pill potentiates its effects.

>Anticoagulants: less effective

>Antidepressants: potentiation

>Barbiturates: decrease Pill effectiveness

>Penicillin: ditto

>Tetracycline: ditto

>Vitamin C: increases estrogen concentration (most pills have estrogen

>and

>progestin)

>Source: Hatcher et al (l988:222-223)

>

>Elena Hannah

>Psychology Department

>Memorial University

>


Back to Archives List
© Lesley Hall and list contributors